por los creyentes son incapaces de creer que no todo el mundo tiene esa necesidad de idolotrar, creer a pies juntillas, de tener fé y todas esas chorradas tan suyas... ah... porque el ladrón piensa que todos son de su condición. Anda y acuesta the guardian.co.uk
Para que no tengáis que perder el tiempo leyendo la columna: se resume en butthurt. Que alguien llame a la wambulancia.
And yet I, and others like me, am reviled in terms far harsher than those kept for real opponents like creationists. We are labelled "accommodationists" for our willingness to give religion a space not occupied by science. We are put down in terms that denote strong emotion, way beyond reason. In The God Delusion, I am likened to Neville Chamberlain, the pusillanimous appeaser of Hitler. Jerry Coyne, author of both the book and the blog Why Evolution is True and an ardent groupie of Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, wrote about one of my books in terms used by George Orwell: "There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them."
The Minnesota biologist PZ Myers, who writes the blog Pharyngula, has referred to me as a "clueless gobshite". And if I had a dollar for everyone who has made a pun out of my last name, I would be a very rich man. Because I will not toe the line absolutely, because I will not bow down in praise of Dawkins and company, because I laugh at their pretentions and positions, I am anathema maranatha.
/Nota: Si Dawkins fuera el líder indiscutiblemente adulado del movimiento ateo, que alguien me explique el pifostio que desencadenó con el "Dear Muslima"
Comentarios
por los creyentes son incapaces de creer que no todo el mundo tiene esa necesidad de idolotrar, creer a pies juntillas, de tener fé y todas esas chorradas tan suyas... ah... porque el ladrón piensa que todos son de su condición. Anda y acuesta the guardian.co.uk
Porque la religión es una invención humana? La diferencia está en la utilización del poder.
Pssee, waste of time...
Porque eres gilipollas y cualquiera cobra un sueldo como periodista.
Porque vemos como Dawkins va por ahí exigiendo prohibir derechos a los demás en base a unos dogmas ateos incuestionables, etc.
Si, debe ser eso
Para que no tengáis que perder el tiempo leyendo la columna: se resume en butthurt. Que alguien llame a la wambulancia.
And yet I, and others like me, am reviled in terms far harsher than those kept for real opponents like creationists. We are labelled "accommodationists" for our willingness to give religion a space not occupied by science. We are put down in terms that denote strong emotion, way beyond reason. In The God Delusion, I am likened to Neville Chamberlain, the pusillanimous appeaser of Hitler. Jerry Coyne, author of both the book and the blog Why Evolution is True and an ardent groupie of Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, wrote about one of my books in terms used by George Orwell: "There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them."
The Minnesota biologist PZ Myers, who writes the blog Pharyngula, has referred to me as a "clueless gobshite". And if I had a dollar for everyone who has made a pun out of my last name, I would be a very rich man. Because I will not toe the line absolutely, because I will not bow down in praise of Dawkins and company, because I laugh at their pretentions and positions, I am anathema maranatha.
/Nota: Si Dawkins fuera el líder indiscutiblemente adulado del movimiento ateo, que alguien me explique el pifostio que desencadenó con el "Dear Muslima"