El manual, que rige a todos los periodistas de Reuters, no había estado disponible en forma gratuita al público hasta ahora, pero la compañía británica decidió ofrecerlo como un servicio y de paso ser más transparentes con la audiencia. En la era del periodismo ciudadano, el manual es "un buen punto de partida para los que están emergiendo como reporteros"...
Algunos los pusieron verdes porque en general no califican acciones ni grupos concretos de terroristas, sino que buscan una descripción objetiva de los hechos.
terrorism
We may refer without attribution to terrorism and counter-terrorism in general but do not refer to specific events as terrorism. Nor do we use the adjective word terrorist without attribution to qualify specific individuals, groups or events. Terrorism and terrorist must be retained when quoting someone in direct speech. When quoting someone in indirect speech, care must be taken with sentence structure to ensure it is entirely clear that they are the source’s words and not a label. Terrorism and terrorist should not be used as single words in inverted commas (e.g. “terrorist”) or preceded by so-called (e.g. a so-called terrorist attack) since that can be taken to imply a value judgment. Use a fuller quote if necessary. Terror as in terror attack or terror cell should be avoided, except in direct quotes.
Report the subjects of news stories objectively, their actions, identity and background. Aim for a dispassionate use of language so that individuals, organisations and governments can make their own judgment on the basis of facts. Seek to use more specific terms like “bomber” or “bombing”, “hijacker” or “hijacking”, “attacker” or “attacks”, “gunman” or “gunmen” etc.
Comentarios
Para la prensa actual creo q le caeria bien,un manual "for dummies"
Me espero a que pongan en la web su manual de Photoshop:
Recopilación de manipulaciones de Reuters en la guerra entre Israel y Hezbolá
Recopilación de manipulaciones de Reuters en la gu...
ajopringue.comPues que se lo pasen a Telecinco...
Relacionada: Reuters sugiere no usar Wikipedia como fuente de información de sus artículos
Reuters sugiere no usar Wikipedia como fuente de i...
abc.es¿Pero TelaHinco hace periodismo o amarillismo?
Algunos los pusieron verdes porque en general no califican acciones ni grupos concretos de terroristas, sino que buscan una descripción objetiva de los hechos.
terrorism
We may refer without attribution to terrorism and counter-terrorism in general but do not refer to specific events as terrorism. Nor do we use the adjective word terrorist without attribution to qualify specific individuals, groups or events. Terrorism and terrorist must be retained when quoting someone in direct speech. When quoting someone in indirect speech, care must be taken with sentence structure to ensure it is entirely clear that they are the source’s words and not a label. Terrorism and terrorist should not be used as single words in inverted commas (e.g. “terrorist”) or preceded by so-called (e.g. a so-called terrorist attack) since that can be taken to imply a value judgment. Use a fuller quote if necessary. Terror as in terror attack or terror cell should be avoided, except in direct quotes.
Report the subjects of news stories objectively, their actions, identity and background. Aim for a dispassionate use of language so that individuals, organisations and governments can make their own judgment on the basis of facts. Seek to use more specific terms like “bomber” or “bombing”, “hijacker” or “hijacking”, “attacker” or “attacks”, “gunman” or “gunmen” etc.