La frase del titular creo que está sacada de aquí, y por eso creo que el traductor se ha hecho un lío.
Asked whether C++ would still be a reference language for efficient computing in 15 years, Stroustrup recalled receiving a similar question from CERN developers more than a decade ago. They were planning systems that would have to remain operational for years. In his view, their confidence in C++ proved justified.
“In 15 years, you could do much, much worse than betting on C++,” he said. He expects the language available then to be noticeably better than it is today. “It’s a language, an ecosystem and a community that’s meant to evolve. It’s meant to address new challenges.”
Dicho lo cual, no entiendo el titular (¿apostar por C++ sería una decisión mucho peor?). El artículo está basado en esta charla reciente:
ep-news.web.cern.ch/cern-steam-academy-puts-the-future-of-scientific-s
La frase del titular creo que está sacada de aquí, y por eso creo que el traductor se ha hecho un lío.
Asked whether C++ would still be a reference language for efficient computing in 15 years, Stroustrup recalled receiving a similar question from CERN developers more than a decade ago. They were planning systems that would have to remain operational for years. In his view, their confidence in C++ proved justified.
“In 15 years, you could do much, much worse than betting on C++,” he said. He expects the language available then to be noticeably better than it is today. “It’s a language, an ecosystem and a community that’s meant to evolve. It’s meant to address new challenges.”