En el primer caso contra un sitio P2P en el que un jurado ha tenido que declarar acerca de la culpabilidad o inocencia del juzgado, lo han encontrado culpable de distribuir material pirateado. Daniel Dove, el último de los tres administradores de la página, se enfrenta ahora a una condena de hasta 10 años de carcel. Los otros dos se declararon culpables para, precisamente, evitar un juicio con jurado.
Culpable ¿de que?
No estaría mal que lo dijeses en la noticia
editado:
aquí lo dice, vaya tío:
"The jury was presented with evidence that Dove was an administrator of a small group of Elite Torrents members known as "Uploaders," who were responsible for supplying pirated content to the group," the Department of Justice press release states. "The evidence showed that Dove recruited members who had very high-speed Internet connections, usually at least 50 times faster than a typical high-speed residential Internet connection, to become Uploaders. The evidence also showed that Dove operated a high-speed server, which he used to distribute pirated content to the Uploaders."
Comentarios
Culpable ¿de que?
No estaría mal que lo dijeses en la noticia
"The jury was presented with evidence that Dove was an administrator of a small group of Elite Torrents members known as "Uploaders," who were responsible for supplying pirated content to the group," the Department of Justice press release states. "The evidence showed that Dove recruited members who had very high-speed Internet connections, usually at least 50 times faster than a typical high-speed residential Internet connection, to become Uploaders. The evidence also showed that Dove operated a high-speed server, which he used to distribute pirated content to the Uploaders."
#1 Gracias por la sugerencia, añadido mínimamente a la introcucción