Una nueva investigación de los científicos Till Wagner y Ian Eisenman, del Instituto de Oceanografía "Scripps" de la UC de San Diego, resuelve un largo debate acerca de la pérdida irreversible del hielo ártico [...] "En otras palabras, ningún punto de no retorno va a terminar con lo que queda de hielo ártico en verano".
“We found that two key physical processes, which were often overlooked in previous process models, were actually essential for accurately describing whether sea ice loss is reversible,” said Eisenman, a professor of climate dynamics at Scripps Oceanography. “One relates to how heat moves from the tropics to the poles and the other is associated with the seasonal cycle. None of the relevant previous process modeling studies had included both of these factors, which led them to spuriously identify a tipping point that did not correspond to the real world.”
Vamos, lo de siempre. Que todo parecido entre los modelos catastrofistas y el mundo real es pura coincidencia.
#1 Lo del clima no es sencillo, si quieres crear modelos que sean realistas tienes tantas variables que al final has de optar por "redondear" y quizá ese redondeo sea vital a pesar de no parecerlo.
Aún así, éste nuevo modelo también podría estar equivocado.
Sensacionalista y wishful thinking.
“In other words, no tipping point is likely to devour what’s left of the Arctic summer sea ice. So if global warming does soon melt all the Arctic sea ice, at least we can expect to get it back if we somehow manage to cool the planet back down again.”
Vamos, que si detenemos las emisiones de carbono y metemos el planeta en una nevera, el Ártico se volverá a congelar. Para ese viaje no hacen falta tantas alforjas.
Comentarios
#0 [Eng] en el titular
#2 Gracias
“We found that two key physical processes, which were often overlooked in previous process models, were actually essential for accurately describing whether sea ice loss is reversible,” said Eisenman, a professor of climate dynamics at Scripps Oceanography. “One relates to how heat moves from the tropics to the poles and the other is associated with the seasonal cycle. None of the relevant previous process modeling studies had included both of these factors, which led them to spuriously identify a tipping point that did not correspond to the real world.”
Vamos, lo de siempre. Que todo parecido entre los modelos catastrofistas y el mundo real es pura coincidencia.
#1 Lo del clima no es sencillo, si quieres crear modelos que sean realistas tienes tantas variables que al final has de optar por "redondear" y quizá ese redondeo sea vital a pesar de no parecerlo.
Aún así, éste nuevo modelo también podría estar equivocado.
Sensacionalista y wishful thinking.
“In other words, no tipping point is likely to devour what’s left of the Arctic summer sea ice. So if global warming does soon melt all the Arctic sea ice, at least we can expect to get it back if we somehow manage to cool the planet back down again.”
Vamos, que si detenemos las emisiones de carbono y metemos el planeta en una nevera, el Ártico se volverá a congelar. Para ese viaje no hacen falta tantas alforjas.